Power: the biggest sin

Power: the biggest sin

“Power? That’s not for me!”

“I’m too small and too good to reach for power.”

by Jon Rappoport

April 19, 2015

NoMoreFakeNews.com

OutsideTheRealityMachine

1.

Everything I write about comes back to the individual. If some mega-corporation is spraying poisons across the land, the effects are felt by every person in their path. Not by some ‘collective’. If I’m writing about power, I’m not referring to The Group.

But these days, the subject of individual power provokes not only animosity but a blank look. What? Power? What’s that? Where did that idea come from? Why are we discussing it?

Isn’t it some old idea people were obsessed with in the ancient past?

Try to find one college that teaches a course in individual power. The very notion of it is laughable.

People are frightened to think about it. They look over their shoulders to see if someone is watching.

They hear the word “power” and assume it automatically refers to bankers and corporate thieves and murderers.

They are therefore opposed to it.

Power is not just a problem now. It has always been. But I’m talking about the hostility of the State toward it.

The State has always preached some version of equality and caring. And despite protests to the contrary, the equality has nothing to do with opportunity for all—it refers to a state of being, as if by merely existing we are all equal in every important respect. When you try to probe the meaning of this view, you can only emerge with: we are all the same. Which of course is a lie.

Those men who control the State know this, because they launched the “equality” propaganda in the first place, as a means for reducing the power of individuals who might challenge “the scepter and the rule,” the kings, the presidents, the monopolies, the cartels, the armies, the mind-programmers.

To say individual power has gotten a bad name would be a vast understatement. It would also ignore the fact that mind-programmers have intentionally equated “individual” with “criminal.”

The necessity of the social contract has been pushed as the justification for all the crimes of the State: “What would happen to us if we didn’t have an organization encompassing the political, the economic, the just, the true, the law?”

No one knows, because there has never been a place or time where many individuals, living in freedom, as neighbors, did so in the absence of the State, the tribe, the clan.

These days, every system and structure of society declares that we must never try that experiment. Thus speaks the survival instinct built into the robot.

As for the living individual, he tends to excuse himself from exploring the upper reaches of his own power, because he suspects he will become too visible to those around him. So he puts on the coat of consensus, he plays that role. He conceals himself. And eventually, he forgets. He develops amnesia about himself.

He adopts the ways of the crowd.

He learns to interpose, between his own ideas and actions, the formula: “greatest good for the greatest number.”

Greatest number of what?

Pursuing this question yields up the only meaningful answer: greatest number of individuals.

Not some “collective whole,” which is a fiction, and at best a metaphor.

But the greatest good for the greatest number of individuals is, at the root, attained by those very individuals themselves.

Believing that everything you do must conform to some standard of “greatest good” is a socially acceptable form of delusion.

When a person says, “What do you mean by power,” he should consider to whom he is really addressing that question.

He is asking himself. He is wondering about himself. He is re-directing an inquiry he himself should be undertaking.

If he embarks on that search, soon enough he will discover or remember that his power is connected to dedication, will, commitment, action, purpose, the unwillingness to surrender—no matter what.

He would prefer an easier road. He would prefer to be given gifts.

He might even discover that his power is part and parcel of that most ignored and discarded faculty: imagination.

What a rude awakening.

Imagination—the plaything he enjoyed as a child and buried when he reached the age of consent.

Imagination—the capacity to envision what never was.

Imagination—a vision of a future that has not yet come into being, a vision that embodies profound desire.

Imagination—waiting to release enormous quantities of untapped energy.

2.

Power…if you don’t want it, you won’t get it. If you don’t want to find it, you won’t. If you keep thinking it’s a bad thing, it will stay a bad thing. If you’re averse to the word, well then, there you are. If you insist on invoking religious connotations, you’re joined at the hip with that. If you feel compelled to invent all sorts of conditions and interpretations about power, to put it through the meat grinder, you’ll end up with mush.

If you feel you must reconfigure the word to prove you’re just a tiny piece of living glitter in the vast universe, in which everything is connected, then you will come to rest in that well-worn corner of metaphysics, and eventually the glitter will go dark.

You will feel you’ve avoided the trap of ego— another word frequently conjoined with power, in order to deface it.

The amount of pride gathered to prove that one is not an egoist is titanic.

“Last night I shined my badge of non-ego for the millionth time and celebrated with a glass of tepid soda water.”

Then there is the intertwining of power with various saints and prophets and saviors and gods—further proof that one isn’t standing up on his own two legs and, therefore, is a member of the humbles-ones, blessed be.

I can guarantee that, yes, the meek will inherit the Earth someday, and because they have stubbornly refused to understand their own inherent power, they’ll become lunatics of the first order. They’ll rain down crimes to make their predecessors green with envy.


Exit From the Matrix


3.

Then we have the simple ones, the “realists.” To them, everything is obvious, and by a fortunate turn of events, what they know is all there is worth knowing.

They believe they are already operating at the limits of power, so there are no questions.

Questions only get in the way of others realizing that they, the realists, are at the forefront of comprehension.

The realists have the answers, if only more people would listen to them.

But here is a clue. The answers realists are talking about are Content. This content precludes the need for the individual to explore the range of his own power. Content supplants exploration. No reason for the individual to push off from the dock in his own ship, with his imagination intact. No. Simply take dictation from the realists and be satisfied.

Create something, invent something that only then exists? Never heard of it.

4.

Power, to be more precise, isn’t sitting there like a discarded nugget of gold. Power isn’t taken. It’s invented, and this is the hardest pill to swallow.

To say it exists in a potential state is invoking a convenient metaphor. Power is created.

In order to make creation possible.

And then…the sensation of trying to push against a steel wall miles thick diminishes, and flow begins…

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

Advertisements

3 comments on “Power: the biggest sin

  1. From Québec says:

    Power has a very bad reputation these days, because most people in power are usually psychopath control freaks.

    We have to rethink power.

    Individual power, the only thing that will take you to your highest potential as a human being. Every time you use your imagination, you gather more power, like a storm when the wind increases in strength.

    Imagine a world where everybody would use their own power. I’m convinced that most humans are decent peoples who would want to create a better life for themselves and their loved ones. So I believe that good power would easily outweigh the bad power.

    Why not give it a try? What is there to lose? What are we waiting for? Let’s create a marvellous world of our own.

  2. From Québec says:

    Yes, individuals can be very powerful.
    Imagination gives you good ideas to make a better life and fight tyranny.

    You give us such great information with your posts. And you teaches people how to live outside the Matrix with your collections courses. But not everyone can afford them.

    So here is what I was thinking :

    Many of your articles are about Vaccines and GMO’s.
    So like I’ve just reply to Mike 78 today, on your post about Australia, why not make and sell T-Shirts about Vaccines and GMO’s on your site? I’m sure you would think of something brilliant to write on these T-Shirts.

    When people want to fight back, they often think it is too complicated: Petitions, Protests, Bill boards, Rallies, etc. So they do nothing.

    But wearing a T-Shirt is not hard to do and buying one is not expensive. And it’s seen everywhere you go. You reach so many people and can start some interesting conversations with people who ask you about your T-Shirt.

    I was thinking that since you are Jon, an entrepreneur, why wouldn’t you sell these kind of T-Shirts on your site to fund your work? I’m sure everyone would buy them.

    Neil Young is using his imagination to fight GMO’s . When the album will be out, I’m sure that it will have a very powerful effect.

    NEIL YOUNG ANNOUNCES ANTI-MONSANTO ALBUM ‘THE MONSANTO YEARS’
    http://WWW.INFOWARS.COM/NEIL-YOUNG-ANNOUNCES-ANTI-MONSANTO-ALBUM-THE-MONSANTO-YEARS/

    “Just looking at the list of new songs on the collection are revealing enough to the central message of the album. Some of the track titles include “Seeds,” “Too Big to Fail,” “Monsanto Years,” and “Rock Starbucks.”

  3. Joe says:

    Good info. I was used heavily by matrix all my life. Awake now…. Gone to Jesus Christ for safety. Spirituality to me is an answer… Also, galactic laws, universal laws apply to us all. Positive thinking and meditation. Then power of applied visualization in meditation, our holographic universe………daily practice. Ommmmm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s